Subject: Re: cc vs gcc in elm
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/12/2002 20:27:07
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:04:58PM -0700, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:36:38PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the elm package explicitely calls cc, which causes problems on solaris
> > (/usr/ucb/cc: language optional software package not installed). The
> > easiest would probably be to change it to always call gcc.
> > Are there zoularis-supported platforms where this could cause a problem
> > (where there is a working cc, and no gcc available) ?
>
> Convert it to use buildlink2. The cc wrapper will call GNU cc.
Does the attached patch looks good ?
It's not enouth, anyway, as it still tries to use cc for ./Configure
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=diff
? README.html
? work
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/mail/elm/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.21 Makefile
--- Makefile 2002/05/26 10:42:39 1.21
+++ Makefile 2002/10/12 18:19:04
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
HOMEPAGE= http://www.instinct.org/elm/
COMMENT= ELM Mail User Agent (without ME extensions)
+USE_BUILDLINK2= YES
+
CONFLICTS+= mm-[0-9]* metamail-[0-9]*
CONFLICTS+= elm-me-[0-9]*
@@ -25,5 +27,5 @@
${MV} ${WRKSRC}/nls/LANGS ${WRKSRC}/nls/LANGS.tmpl
${SED} -e 's:__PREFIX:'${PREFIX}':g' < ${WRKSRC}/nls/LANGS.tmpl > ${WRKSRC}/nls/LANGS
-.include "../../devel/gettext-lib/buildlink.mk"
+.include "../../devel/gettext-lib/buildlink2.mk"
.include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--