Subject: Re: mozilla stability (or lack thereof) vs. gdk-pixbuf.
To: NetBSD Packages Technical Discussion List <tech-pkg@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/09/2002 18:20:36
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 12:15:32PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Now if I'm not grossly mistaken gdk-pixbuf replaces Imlib. The
> Mozilla documentation says mozilla uses "Imagelib" to load images. Is
> graphics/imlib the same as what they call "Imagelib"? Is Imagelib
> more robust?
http://www.libpr0n.com/
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/libimage/libpr0n.html
regards,
--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> ASCII Ribbon campaign against /"\=
--
-- <salo@silcnet.org> e-mail in gratuitous HTML and \ /=
--
-- Microsoft proprietary formats X =
--
-- PGPkey: http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp / \=
--
-- Key Fingerprint: DBEC 8BEC 9A90 ECEC 0FEF 716E 59CE B70B 7E3B 70E2 =
--
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE9A4BUWc63C347cOIRAmJMAJ0f4yJsSKOVJztOhLv11cHcPzq6IACgrWTr
N1b3qrGX7IYi8n7QEaHS4C4=
=GfRM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--