Subject: Re: pth or pth-syscall ???
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Julio Merino <jmmv@hispabsd.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/03/2002 13:12:27
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:44:03PM +0200, ptiJo wrote:
> On the last episode, "Ciarcinski, Adam (ISS Brussels)"
> <ACiarcinski@iss.net> said to "'ptiJo'" <ptiJo@noos.fr>,
> tech-pkg@netbsd.org:
>=20
> > > So I guess those are the same ?
> > > Then why having two differents (and conflicting) packages ?
> > > Would a "USE_PTHREAD=3Dnative pth pth-syscall" in=20
> > > /etc/mk.conf solve
> > > this ?
> >=20
> > In my humble opinion, it's better to add
> >=20
> > PTHREAD_TYPE=3Dpth-syscall
> >=20
> > to /etc/mk.conf
I've also got the same problem when trying to compile qt3. What I do not
know is what does 'native' type means when specifying threading type.
Is native the value specified in PTHREAD_TYPE? If so, I will need to
recompile everything against pth-syscall (glib, gnome...) so I can
successfully compile kde3. Is this right? Or 'native' is added to allow
the nathans_wa (or whatever it's called) implementation when it's merged?
Thanks.
--=20
Of course it runs NetBSD - http://www.netbsd.org
HispaBSD member - http://www.hispabsd.org
Julio Merino <jmmv@hispabsd.org>
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE8+08bzz00ZOPKycwRAo99AKCpZ02uBxThEVU24jA8NmBHXlETlACeOWBO
9HRsjqLLvFhQxjyzwYGqBh0=
=b3CA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DocE+STaALJfprDB--