On Friday 12 April 2002 10:24 pm, Rene Hexel wrote:
>   Hi everybody,
> 
>   is there any specific reason not to rename the autoconf-devel-2.52
> package to autoconf-2.52 (I'm talking about the package name here, not
> the directory name, which would remain 'autoconf-devel', of course). 
> This would remove the necessity for the explicit CONFLICTS line with
> autoconf-[0-9]*.
> 
>   This would also allow people to use autoconf-devel in place auf
> autoconf without requiring changes to other packages' DEPENDS (and thus
> closing PR pkg/16275, for example).
> 
>   Any objections to committing these changes (after the pkgsrc tag, of
> course)?

None from me.

Nick