on alpha:

....
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/texinfo/makeinfo -I..
-I/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/texinfo/lib -I../intl
-DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/pkg/gcc-2.95.3/share/locale\"  -O2 -c
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/texinfo/makeinfo/makeinfo.c
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/texinfo/makeinfo -I..
-I/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/texinfo/lib -I../intl
-DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/pkg/gcc-2.95.3/share/locale\"  -O2 -c
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/texinfo/makeinfo/multi.c
cc -O2 -s -o makeinfo  makeinfo.o multi.o ../lib/libtxi.a
../intl/libintl.a 
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/texinfo/makeinfo'
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/texinfo'
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/texinfo'
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/etc'
gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/etc'
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/gcc'
(cd intl && /usr/pkg/bin/gmake all)
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/gcc/intl'
gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/gcc/intl'
cc -c  -DIN_GCC -DHAIFA    -O2  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H    -I.
-I/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/gcc
-I/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/gcc/config
-I/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/gcc/../include \
  /usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/gcc/gencheck.c
In file included from
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/gcc-2.95.3/gcc/gencheck.c:21:
hconfig.h:14: xm-target64.h: No such file or directory
gmake[1]: *** [gencheck.o] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/pkgsrc/lang/gcc/work.bondage/objdir/gcc'
gmake: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
*** Error code 2

Stop.
*** Error code 1

Stop.


-dan



On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, James Chacon wrote:

> There's no real reason that lang/gcc should be marked as only available
> for 2-3 platforms.
> 
> The in-tree copy of gcc 2.95.3 has been fully ported to all the major archs
> and except for pc532 really should be workable on everything.
> 
> In any case I've made a new patchset based on the latest -current copy of
> gcc and put a copy of this on
> 
> ftp.netbsd.org:/pub/NetBSD/misc/jmc/gcc.tar
> 
> It unpacks as lang/gcc/
> 
> I'd like folks to test this if possible and let me know if they encounter
> any errors (I'd be surprised as it's built clean for me so far on x86, powerpc
> and sparc64 and this build mimics what tools/toolchain does for its
> bootstrap buid).
> 
> After that I had a few questions since the cvs logs are deficient in stating
> why certain things are as they are:
> 
> 
> 1. A few (10 or so) packages for SunOS require lang/egcs. Can anyone think of
>    a reason that shouldn't be turned into lang/gcc?
> 
> 2. Why was there a special PLIST.NetBSD-sparc? My sparc box is currently 
>    offline but I know 2.95.3 works on it. This is definitly an arch if someone
>    has a box available testing this would be nice.
> 
> 3. Look in Makefile.gcc and let me know what people think. Basically the idea
>    is anything which relies on lang/gcc is doing this because of features
>    required. So the test for egcs vs. 2.95.3 is in here and only if the 
>    installed gcc isn't 2.95.3 will this package get pulled in as a build 
>    dependency. There's a var to force it anyways if need be.
> 
> (What prompted all of this was powerpc not having lang/gcc support and there's
> 30 some odd packages that don't build in my bulk builds then)
> 
> James
> 
> 
>