On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Frederick Bruckman wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > > We could just define MASTER_SITES_1, MASTER_SITES_2, MASTER_SITES_3, to
> > > be matched with DISTFILES_1, DISTFILES_2, DISTFILES_3, respectively. I
> > > doubt that we'd ever need more than three, and if a package ever did, it
> > > would be easy to follow the pattern to add one (or two, or three).
> >
> > Why not just MASTER_SITES.${DISTFILE} ?
>
> Yeah, that could work! We shouldn't check ${MASTER_SITES.foo.gz} for the
> main distfile, just for the the supplemental DISTFILES and PATCH_FILES.

	Probably worth doing for the main distfile too - would be an easy
	way to handle all the supplemental DISTFILES and PATCH_FILES
	coming from one place and the main from another?

-- 
		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --