>> >How many people really need emacs20?
>> 
>> i think it's an issue of "want", not "need".
>
>Well, OK, how many still want emacs20?  21 is much more reliable than
>even a patched 20.7, and it is for the most part backwards compatible.

maybe it's a tradeoff between how much space it wants to eat up
vs. features.

most people could *probably* get by with a good old 18.59, right?

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."