What happens if you add the destination dir
	(${PREFIX}/office52/program) and the installdir
	(/usr/pkgsrc/misc/staroffice/work/tmp/sv001.tmp) to the start
	of LD_PATH?

-- 
		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --


On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Martti Kuparinen wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I've been trying to update the StarOffice package and the result
> looks quite promising, i.e. it's ALMOST working. I still have
> problems with Linux emulation and LD_LIBRARY_PATH and I'd like
> to get some help from you.
>
> If Makefile's LD_PATH doesn't contain "." the installation program
> (setup.bin) fails before displaying any window:
>
> glibc version: 2.1.3
> /usr/pkgsrc/misc/staroffice/work/tmp/sv001.tmp/setup.bin: error in loading shared libraries: libvos1GCC.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Then I added "." to the end of LD_PATH and the result was the same.
> Adding "." in the front of LD_PATH makes the installation work almost
> to the end, i.e. it fails in "Registration of the components".
>
> 	LD_PATH=.:${TMPDIR}:${WRKSRC}:${EMULDIR}/lib:${EMULDIR}/usr/lib
>
> Adding ${PREFIX}/office52/program into LD_PATH didn't help either :-(
>
> The coredump in /usr/pkg/office52/program/ shows this:
>
> 	Core was generated by `setup.bin'.
> 	Program terminated with signal 6, Abort trap.
> 	./libvos1GCC.so: No such file or directory.
> 	#0  0x4974ca71 in ?? ()./libsal1.so: No such file or directory.
>
> Those two libs were during the installation is a temporary directory
> (work/staroffice-en-5.2/sv00*.tmp) so the current path setting (".")
> found them but now those files are in /usr/pkg/office52/program/
>
> Is it possible to re-read the settings somehow or what should we do?
> I don't see this happen in FreeBSD, i.e. the installation worked
> just fine...
>
> Please help me, get the files from
>
> 	http://www.piuha.net/~martti/tmp/staroffice.tgz
>
> and try to find the error. Please note that I haven't touched
> pkg/PLIST* so this is not a complete thing yet!
>
> If you manage to install and run this, please let me know and
> I'll clean up the Makefile and submit a PR...
>
> PS. Shouldn't we update the Linux emulation package to install
>     /emul/linux/bin/test? The current approach of creating a
>     symlink for the installation is quite ugly.
>
> Martti
>
> ---
> Martti Kuparinen <martti.kuparinen@iki.fi>              NetBSD - No media hype
> http://www.iki.fi/~kuparine/                            http://www.netbsd.org/
>
>