On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > I believe that would be when it can build a test executable, but the
> > executable won't run. I don't know why that would break the package,
> > as such, but it might be an indication of a broken toolchain.
> 
> Let's save believing for the church, and better wait for the config.log :)
> 

yeah, the config.log will have the answer.  I've seen this when you get a
funny LDFLAGS or the like or perhaps a bad rpath where the compiler fails.  

-dan