Subject: Re: two questions: upgrading meta packages, pkg database
To: Rainer J.H. Brandt <rjhb@bb-c.de>
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/20/2001 02:37:00
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Rainer J.H. Brandt wrote:
> What is the preferred upgrade method for "packages" like gnome ?
deinstall recursively, then rebuild with new libs etc.
I recomment using precompiled binary pkgs where available.
> 2. I would like to audit my system with respect to the files maintained by the
> package system, just like I do it on my Solaris machines. Under that
> operating system, the software database tells me about the file ownerships
> and permissions, and it has an opinion about whether a file's contents
> should be expected to change.
>
> Am I correct if I believe that the NetBSD package system does not maintain
> that information? Do plans exist to improve the system so that it will
> maintain that data in the future?
We do contain MD5 checksums of all files installed. You can do a check of
that with:
pkg_admin check
for all packages or
pkg_admin check foo-1.8
for a single pkg.
> 3. Which document should I have read in order to save you from being bothered
> by my questions?
1. Manpages: pkg_add(8), pkg_delete(8), pkg_info(8), pkg_create(8),
pkg_admin(8))
2. pkgsrc/Packages.txt
3. packages(7)
4. The list archive
5. bsd.pkg.mk & pkg_* source :-)
- Hubert
--
Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>