On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, David Burgess wrote:

> I don't have any objection to putting it in the Obvious location.  You
> could even add a third section that talks about how send-pr and pkgsrc
> should be addressed (since the steps for reporting a recommended change
> to the pkgsrc are a little different from reporting 'base' system
> changes).
>
	We already have a pkgsrc/README which _should_ cover those
	details - or refer to Packages.txt and packages(7) as appropriate.
	If you find anything missing - please submit a patch! :)

> I'm easy though; I think it should be somewhere in the pkgsrc tree (I
> have lots of machines that have the pkgsrc tree mounted by NFS) so
> pkgsrc and pkgsrc/mk are both OK.  The former seems (like you said) more
> obvious, but the latter doesn't add another entry to the base of the
> pkgsrc directory.

	I'm changing my mind here and suggesting it belongs better with
	pkg-CHANGES (as suggested by Hubert). Of course I'd prefer to
	see both pkg-CHANGES and pkg-TODO moved to pkgsrc, but I'd be
	happy with them in docs :)

		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --