Subject: Re: What to do about unfixed vulnerabilities?
To: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@proper.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/26/2000 10:43:50
--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 08:38:47AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 10:52 AM -0400 10/25/00, Andrew Brown wrote:
> > >FWIW, the Pine folks tell me they are releasing Pine 1.3 in the next
> >>few days and it covers both of the holes. I have found the UWash
> >>folks eager to do The Right Thing on most issues.
> >
> >perhaps i'm confused because i don't use pine, but how is that an
> >upgrade over 4.21?
>=20
> Typo on my part: they're releasing 4.3, not 1.3 (which I think they=20
> released about a decade ago...)
And they have floating point version numbers, instead of version.revision?
-is
--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQEVAgUBOffuwxaMtq2zjsJVAQF2aAf+NHMwqavRowUdmZFBR7QJz1hdq/SkLz5V
rm4qiIQ8Bq9cqHT2a/s6Olpr958DlajFMGiyl8fR2kZJPxEa0JL3RKcxjLGhhGma
fqXPOzbjcsiuPHJ6KEwlp6SA6EWguLLt1POkKxWlqPyvORZ9ayUjAESPIsLzCjj1
Bvc0WRaEiTBHEV+nygl1sb4n0ZqRe0ARKz/vQ5a7lY1FJI7l7UBAHYv2AizGcYtV
9qf4s0paabZFEZlhDkyNSZbH0bPscq91pkZ6HVFbBZZWlRxdTA8NADIWg002gObZ
RMsawtCBIWh9/Xi6ibAou6Jv6hkoGn1mPRLjupOSSUt9S7/ElZ7ckQ==
=lS5+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc--