Subject: Re: make libtool pkg depend on c++rt0 pkg ?
To: Nick Hudson <nick@nthcliff.demon.co.uk>
From: None <mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/06/2000 11:16:17
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Alistair Crooks wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:43:13 +0200 (MET DST), Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> 
> >  On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Nick Hudson wrote:
> >  > If everyone can agree at what they want to happen I can take a look at
> >  > doing it. Todd's suggestion seems to make sense.
> >  
> >  I don't really care, plus I'm not familiar with the internals. 
> >  So -=> Todd's the boss. :)
> 
> Well, I do care (passionately) about what happens to things in pkgsrc.
> Having said that, it's a sane thing to do - go for it.

as long as we're sure that libtool isn't the only place that wants to link
c++rt0.o   Ie, if there are other places in pkgsrc which do that without
using libtool, things will still not be quite right.  I'm not sure if this
is the case or not.

-dan