Subject: Re: mail/qpopper: mark it broken?
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/31/2000 09:20:36
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:16:07AM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
>
> >> shouldn't we mark pkgsrc/mail/qpopper (2.53) broken for local exploit,
> >> and try to upgrade to 3.02?
> >> http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1&date=2000-05-22&msg=p04320305b5511470392c@[192.168.1.5]
> >I think there's also a patch for 2.53 around ...
>
> I'm just curious (not objecting), is there any strong reason to
> stick to 2.5x? if there is I would like to know...
I don't know, I didn't try the 3.0.x serie :)
--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--