Subject: Re: location of man pages
To: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
From: Scott Aaron Bamford <sab@ansic.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/04/2000 22:49:04
sorry, what i should have said:
how come pkgsrc uses
${LOCALBASE}/man
and not
${LOCALBASE}/share/man
like basesrc does.
- Scott
("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
------------------------------ `6_6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
sab@ansic.net | (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
sab@zeekuschrist.com | _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,'
--------------------------- (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' ----
On Thu, 4 May 2000, David Brownlee wrote:
> To keep to the ${LOCALBASE} hierarchy - same as bin, lib, sbin,
> libexec etc.
>
>
> David/absolute
> -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --
>
>On Thu, 4 May 2000, Scott Aaron Bamford wrote:
>
>> Can someone tell me the reason pkgsrc installs its packages in
>> ${LOCALBASE}/man while basesrc uses /usr/src/share/man? how come
>> pkgsrc doesnt use share/man ?
>>
>> tia.
>> - Scott
>>
>> ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
>> ------------------------------ `6_6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
>> sab@ansic.net | (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
>> sab@zeekuschrist.com | _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,'
>> --------------------------- (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' ----
>>
>>
>
>
>