Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc
To: None <>
From: Manuel Bouyer <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 04/09/2000 14:12:22
On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 04:20:28AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> In retrospect i have to say that the idea of renaming the ghostscript most
> people use and expect was really suboptimal. A gsnoX wouldn't have
> required all these changes. ;(

Yes. And I didn't think about this when I saw the change but now I'll have
to teach my users to use gsx11 instead of gs ... Much harder than fixing

Can we eventually change this ? (i.e. gs->gsnoX and gsx11->gs) ?
We could eventually keep gsx11, and just rename gs to gsnoX, so that it's
at last possible to put a symlink.

Manuel Bouyer <>