Subject: Re: removing RUN_DEPENDS
To: Frederick Bruckman <fb@enteract.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 02/28/2000 23:46:47
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > Someone[tm] should probably s/ALL/SOME/ there. :-)
> > If the fix works for you, please commit it, I cannot test it.
> 
> OK, I did it slightly differently. Rather than have {NO,ALL,YES,any}
> (which gives me a headache thinking about what "any" would do),
> there's only {NO,ALL,any}. It should still work the same as before
> with DEINSTALLDEPENDS set to anything but "NO" or "ALL", (including
> "YES"). Probably best to leave "ALL" undocumented, until a more
> elegant scheme is worked out.

Er, it was "YES", "NO" and "ALL" before, no "any" anywhere. :)
Looking at the change, if it works for you, it works for me too. :)
(I just need _everything_ blown away with some switch)


 - Hubert 

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra