Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> > Import of p5-perl-ldap-0.13, a set of perl classes for LDAP access.
> 
> Um, isn't p5-perl-* redundant?

  Yes, I think it is.  However, for consistency, I try to name CPAN
modules the way they are originally called w/ p5- prepended.  What's
more important, we already have p5-LDAP-* (which is a different beast,
altogether).

  So, if there is a consensus about renaming p5-perl-ldap to p5-ldap, I
suggest we rename p5-LDAP to p5-Mozilla-LDAP or some such ...

  Cheers
      ,
   Rene