Subject: Re: proposal: USE_FORTRAN
To: None <mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu>
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 11/18/1999 00:43:55
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu wrote:
> .if defined(USE_FORTRAN)
> .if !exists(/usr/bin/f77) || defined(USE_F2C)
> DEPENDS+= f2c-19989812:${PKGSRCDIR}/lang/f2c
How about RUN_DEPENDS=...(different syntax) ?
> The remaining question I have is if we should make f2c be the default
> for now since f77 is buggy. Long term, the goal should be to not ship a
> buggy compiler. I could perhaps implement f2c being the default by
> something like:
>
> USE_F2C?= YES
> .if defined(USE_F2C)
> .if ${USE_F2C}=="NO"
> .undef USE_F2C
> .endif
> .endif
Well, in that case save the .if-hackery and make the test:
.if !exists(/usr/bin/f77) || (defined(USE_F2C) && ${USE_F2C} == "YES")
(or anything of more appropriate syntax)
> I will collect comments and suggestions before implementing this and doing
> the final testing on my system.
No objections from me, the ones noted above aside.
- Hubert
--
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra