In article <Pine.NEB.4.10.9907300936530.189-100000@server.int.duh.org>,
	Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com> writes:
> Was this peer reviewed?

I discussed it with another package developer.

>  This goes hard against standard pkg practice.

I know. But many INN binaries and scripts have hardcoded assumptions
about the structure of the installation directory.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                http://home.owl.de/~tron/