On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Chris Ewert wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that the current Pico/Pine combination doesn't
> seem to work?  Pico seems to be to new for Pine.  It is complining about
> not finding libpico.so.1.0 but libpico.so.2.0 _does_ exist.  Any
> suggestions?

Update your sources & try again? 
I've just done a installation of pico & pine from latest sources, and it
works fine for me, on 1.4/i386.

Are you sure you don't have any old pine/pico flying around, maybe in
/usr/local or so? Maybe an old version of any of these packages?


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra