In article <Pine.NEB.4.05.9901140016090.12844-100000@duhnet.net> tv@pobox.com (Todd Vierling) writes:
>On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Simon Burge wrote:
>
>: > All but one: usr/lib/libdl.so.1.0.
>: > 
>: > (You can get a new ld.so, new libc, etc., etc., but they've never to my
>: > knowledge patched libdl.)
>: 
>: I dunno if these are publicly available (we've got platinum maintenance
>: on all our suns), but they contain libdl.so.1:
>: 
>: 	102049-05       2.4
>
>I didn't say libdl.so.1, which is Solaris's libdl.
>
>I said libdl.so.1.0, for Solaris 1.x (SunOS 4.x).  :)

then you can probably make the package for solaris :-)
Even writing libdl.so.1.0 is trivial... but then one can be almost
certain that #define YOU_DONT_HAVE_A_LICENSE.

christos