Subject: Re: Package Paths Proposal
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@most.weird.com>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/12/1998 02:56:39
[ On Fri, December 11, 1998 at 21:58:24 (-0500), Todd Vierling wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Package Paths Proposal
>
> As per some of the suggestions I made in private mail, I've pruned this a
> bit; see below and add comments.
> 
> The biggest changes are, of course, that /pkg has no `usr' subdirectory (to
> reduce a *lot* of confusion possibility), /var is used directly, and
> /pkg/etc contains shared config files that can be replaced simply on a
> per-host basis, even with binary pkgs.

I think your preference is simply another option to the original proposal:

	/pkg/usr -> .

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>      <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>