On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
> I think he invalidated himself when he said:
> "The other kernel only included the i686 definition, making it specific
> to Pentium III processors or higher."
>
> I can only assume that this is the kind of thing Hubert was talking
> about when his blog mentioned "Aaah, the joy of people who have no idea
> of what they're writing about still being bold enough to write about
> things they have no idea about."

I'd appreciate it if you would not cite me completely out of context to 
support your flames. I recommend you go back and read the article about 
which I wrote what you cite.

FWIW, I think Tony definitely knows a fair bit about what he's writing, 
and maybe you should start think about how NetBSD could make things easier 
to do what he really wanted (add cpu-specific compiler flags).


> Wow, long rant.

Indeed. If you want to start changing things for the better
-> http://www.netbsd.org/contrib/howto.html (patches preferred :)


  - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Free AND Open!      (And of course secure, portable, yadda yadda)