Subject: Re: File system performance on i386
To: Kevin P. Neal <kpneal@pobox.com>
From: Bharani Chadalavada <bharani.chadalavada@nexsi.com>
List: tech-perform
Date: 02/23/2001 17:46:18
It may be the case that the driver is screwing it up. But I did see that the
default file system settings are not optimal enough. Some more investigation is
needed into the driver.

Bharani.

"Kevin P. Neal" wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:09:55PM -0800, Bharani Chadalavada wrote:
> > I am attaching the dmesg output. I am using pciide and not wdc. This brings
> > to my original question. Can something be done to make the performance
> > equal to/better than Linux??
>
> I'm tuning in a little bit late here, but are we positive the performance
> problem is the filesystem? Is it possible the problem is the pciide
> driver?
>
> Does NetBSD talk to the drive at the same levels of PIO and DMA?
> --
> Kevin P. Neal                                http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/
>       'Concerns about "rights" and "ownership" of domains are inappropriate.
>  It is appropriate to be concerned about "responsibilities" and "service"
>  to the community.' -- RFC 1591, page 4: March 1994