Re: nd6 'stale' timer unreasonably long?

[Timo Buhrmester <timo%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>]

> [...] leading to packet loss.

I guess the following comment (in sys/netinet6/nd6.c) is relevant.

/*
 * XXX entries that are "less recently used" should be
 * freed first.
 */

(I think this is a TODO, right?)