Re: ALTQ modifications proposal

[Emmanuel Nyarko <emmankoko519%gmail.com@localhost>]

> On 22 Jun 2025, at 2:54 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:19:14PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
>> 
>> If there really no useful setups which fq-codel could replace?
>> Including "I need to simulate packet loss and odd bandwidth behaviour
>> to stress my other systems"?
> 
> I use 'tc' at work to simulate WAN conditions when testing a number of
> Linux-based products.  To my knowledge, the "queueing disciplines" used for
> this purpose have nothing to do with fq-codel, and it can't replace them.
> 
Okay then for use case, i would leave it. The whole plan was to have HFSC + fq codel. 
one scheduler and one queuing. but then again, i think I will leave it and find another way out.

Emmanuel