tech-net archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 07:33:37AM +0000, Emmanuel Nyarko wrote:
>
> > On 5 Jun 2025, at 11:12???PM, Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
> >
> > What will happen when a socket changes hands by file descriptor passing
> > over a Unix domain socket?
>
> But the reason is I want to add this support is for NPF to be able to give a user based security to Unix servers in network layer. Like being able to allow or deny certain users on a server from giving out resources. so maybe for now, even if I???m doing it as opt-in, I can still exempt UDS from it because I don???t think it will add anything to Unix Domain Sockets
I don't think you understand. I can accept a TCP connection on an AF_INET
socket, then take the resulting file descriptor and transfer it to a
completely unrelated process using a control message on an AF_UNIX socket.
That process can be owned by a different user. What do you intend to happen
to the AF_INET socket that is passed in this way?
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index