Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process

To: Emmanuel Nyarko <emmankoko519%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:57:09 -0700


> On Jun 5, 2025, at 7:51 PM, Emmanuel Nyarko <emmankoko519%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> And also, fchown, no support for it yet ? 

fchown()?  It changes the uid/gid of a file on disk, like chown() but takes a file descriptor rather than a path.

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Next by Date: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Next by Thread: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index