Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative

[Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>]

>> [...jitter+optimizer...]

>> Perhaps this is appropriate for the sort of use case where you
>> install (and trust) binaries someone else built, protected by
>> nothing stronger than HTTPS [...]

> [...], my points were about specific BPF extensions, sending binaries
> over HTTPS wasn't on my mind!

It wasn't on mine, either, except as an abbreviated description of the
kind of low-security mindset a lot of sites seem to use.  I certainly
didn't mean to imply that fetching anything from the net at run time
was any part of the scheme under discussion!

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B