tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: RFC1948

In article <>,
Jason Thorpe  <> wrote:
>RFC6528 is standards-track:
> why this change instead?

This change just simplified the existing code, and restored the
default randomization behavior prior without the information leak.
I will look into implementing rfc6528.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index