Re: rtadvd(8) for rump

[Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-net%mumble.net@localhost>]

> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 01:31:57 +0100
> From: Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>
> 
> I plan to check in the attached patch to rtadvd(8) to make it work
> better under rump.
> 
> It removes the privsep code when built as rump.rtadvd.
> 
> I can't think of a way of setting up a path to a rump server socket that
> remains the same across a call to chroot(2).

Why does the path matter at that point?  Shouldn't the socket already
be connected by rumpclient_init by then?  What is the problem you're
trying to solve by this?