tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert

To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason%zx2c4.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
From: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:51:35 +0000

Yes, we get it, you took a trademark over the term WireGuard so we can't
use it, so you can send threatening emails about how you don't like the
changes. Why don't we just call it wg and get it over with?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld

References:
- "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld
- Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
  - From: Taylor R Campbell
- Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld

Prev by Date: Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
Next by Date: Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
Previous by Thread: Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
Next by Thread: Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index