[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ipip (gif) tunnels and npf
john%ziaspace.com@localhost (John Klos) writes:
>> NAT should look at packets on the outgoing interface and these should be
>> rewritten, wether they are e.g. IP+TCP or IP+IP packets shouldn't
>SHOULD, yes. Although I didn't put my config in the original message, it's
>exactly what you put and what's in the example configuration. From npfctl
>map re0 dynamic any -> 220.127.116.11 pass family inet4 from 10.0.100.0/24
>Should I create a PR?
Of course :)
Michael van Elst
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Main Index |
Thread Index |