Re: ipip (gif) tunnels and npf

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

john%ziaspace.com@localhost (John Klos) writes:

>> NAT should look at packets on the outgoing interface and these should be 
>> rewritten, wether they are e.g. IP+TCP or IP+IP packets shouldn't 
>> matter.

>SHOULD, yes. Although I didn't put my config in the original message, it's 
>exactly what you put and what's in the example configuration. From npfctl 
>show:

>map re0 dynamic any -> 76.169.240.26 pass family inet4 from 10.0.100.0/24

>Should I create a PR?


Of course :)

-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."