tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ipip (gif) tunnels and npf (John Klos) writes:

>> NAT should look at packets on the outgoing interface and these should be 
>> rewritten, wether they are e.g. IP+TCP or IP+IP packets shouldn't 
>> matter.

>SHOULD, yes. Although I didn't put my config in the original message, it's 
>exactly what you put and what's in the example configuration. From npfctl 

>map re0 dynamic any -> pass family inet4 from

>Should I create a PR?

Of course :)

                                Michael van Elst
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index