Re: route(4): Adding ROUTE_MSGFILTER socket option

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <18202.1491947239%andromeda.noi.kre.to@localhost>,
Robert Elz  <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost> wrote:
>    Date:        Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:25:33 +0100
>    From:        Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
>    Message-ID:  <49383066-985b-f8ee-3d6f-28f131ea1a5c%marples.name@localhost>
>
>  | I didn't see any other RTM_* consumers in our tree.
>
>sbin/routed and usr.sbin/route6d are likely to benefit.
>
>There are also a whole bunch of processes that write to the routing socket,
>then read it, to verify that the message they sent was received - most of
>those are essentially one-off uses (do something and exit, like sbin/route)
>but a couple (rarpd ldpd - more? didn't see any, but...) are daemons and
>might possibly benefit.
>

Don't forget the racoon.

christos