Re: tail loss probe

[Alistair Crooks <agc%pkgsrc.org@localhost>]

I'd like to see it in-tree - it's useful, and provides a speedup.

Best,
Alistair

On 26 July 2016 at 14:10, Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost> wrote:
> In article <nn77ut$fpp$1%ger.gmane.org@localhost>,
> Mihai Chelaru  <chelaru%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>>On 25/07/16 23:56, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>>> In article
>><CADbiSKXXUZtJEaEPo-RN3USARHCKpj5jTt5L2G+94g_JgPvvXg%mail.gmail.com@localhost>,
>>> Mihai Chelaru  <chelaru%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm running with this [
>>>> http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/kefren/tcp_tlp.diff ] tail loss
>>>> probe patch for some days already without noticing any issue.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts ?
>>>
>>> LGTM. The latest rfc-draft has been expired for 3 years. What's the current
>>> status for it?
>>>
>>> christos
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Personally, I don't think it will make it into an RFC by itself.
>
> Let's have a couple of more people chime and and add it if they say ok (or
> stay silent). if the sysctl is by default off, it is not a problem anyway.
>
> christos
>