Re: IPv6 Stable Private Addresses RFC 7217

[Ted Lemon <mellon%fugue.com@localhost>]

On Jun 4, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger 
<joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> Replacement or addition? I'm not sure I like removing the normal MAC
> derived autoconfig address, but I am certainly fine with having a
> separate (non-link local) address. This would be more in line with the
> behavior of the privacy extension implementetd in many systems.

It's intended by the IETF to be a replacement.   The address is meant to be 
stable, so you don't need some other stable address for receiving connections, 
the way you would with temporary addresses.