tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?

To: Darren Reed <darrenr%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
From: Ted Lemon <mellon%fugue.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:08:54 -0400

On Jun 3, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Darren Reed <darrenr%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> Of course when a NIC
> is down, it is not possible for DAD to start so non-link local addresses
> are never marked safe for use.

Isn't DAD applicable to link-local addresses as well?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
  - From: Roy Marples

References:
- IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
  - From: Darren Reed
- Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
  - From: Darren Reed

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
Previous by Thread: Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
Next by Thread: Re: IPv6 socket behaviour different to IPv4?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index