Re: ifconfig v2

To: tech-net%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: ifconfig v2
From: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:07:43 -0400 (EDT)

>> [...] unless you also propose to break noncontiguous netmasks
>> completely [...]
> Breaking noncontiguous netmasks sounds like a good idea to me.

Why?  What harm are they doing that outweighs (to you) breaking an
occasionally useful (if little-used) facility that's been there pretty
much since day one?

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ifconfig v2
  - From: John Hawkinson

References:
- ifconfig v2
  - From: David Young
- Re: ifconfig v2
  - From: John Hawkinson
- Re: ifconfig v2
  - From: Mouse
- Re: ifconfig v2
  - From: Matt Thomas

Prev by Date: Re: ifconfig v2
Next by Date: Re: ifconfig v2
Previous by Thread: Re: ifconfig v2
Next by Thread: Re: ifconfig v2
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index