tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Mandatory PFIL_HOOKS

To: Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Mandatory PFIL_HOOKS
From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:58:50 +0100

Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> Could you put the pfil hook code in if (__predict_false()) ... ?  ISTR
> that this made a little change when benchmarking packet forwarding.

You want to avoid function call overhead?  I will add a check.  However,
I think the __predict_false() part is not fair. :)

-- 
Mindaugas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mandatory PFIL_HOOKS
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Mandatory PFIL_HOOKS
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: Mandatory PFIL_HOOKS
  - From: Masao Uebayashi

Prev by Date: Re: cleaning the IPSec litter (was Re: CVS commit: src/sys)
Next by Date: Re: Locking question
Previous by Thread: Re: Mandatory PFIL_HOOKS
Next by Thread: Re: Mandatory PFIL_HOOKS
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index