Re: apparently missing locking in if_bnx.c

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:40:22PM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:30:06PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:20:25PM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:30:40PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This is what I've just commited. This doesn't mean your patch isn't
> > > > correct, but I prefer to go the easy way for netbsd-6 first.
> > > 
> > > So bnx is safe on netbsd-6-to-be? What about netbsd-5.1?
> > 
> > The workqueue is not present in netbsd-5; which means it may be subject
> > to PR# 45051
> 
> Oh. Planning to deploy a bnx machine as a Xen server shortly. What to do?

ftp.lip6.fr, web and ftp server, with traffic graphs always above 100Mb/s
has a bnx interface and has never run into PR# 45051 ...

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--