Re: Experiments with npf on -current

[Zoltan Arnold NAGY <zoltan.arnold.nagy%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Jeremy C. Reed <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost> 
wrote:
>> interest of progress.Remember that this is -CURRENT, where things like
>> this are *supposed* to happen?
>
>
> As for me, I was glad Darren pointed this out. (In fact, I was quite
> surprised when I read the followup acknowledging known buggy code living
> in -current.)
[...]
> We should suggest and even force that code known to be broken to be
> reverted. (Well I think this is already true, but not happening?) (It
> will be easier when we have a better revision control so many can work
> easier on branches.)

When I committed the code, I did test it with both v4 and v6. Apart from the TCP
state engine bugs, I did not encounter any issues, that's why the commit.

Sorry if it got thru. I'll work with rmind@ on the weekend to fix these.

Best,
Zoltan