On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:17 -0600, David Young wrote: > > route change 192.168.0.0/24 -ifp re1 > > Reach destination 192.168.0.0/24 through re1. This is the case which I'm interested in. At this point it becomes a managed route, so whilst dropping the IFA_ROUTE flag is correct, we should not add it to the sockaddr_dl ifa. > > ifconfig re0 -alias 192.168.0.1 # connected route remains, ok > > ifconfig re1 -alias 192.168.0.2 > > > > Now, if the last route style command is used, the last ifconfig command > > will not remove the connected route. If the other two where used (ifa > > specified) then the connected route is removed. > > I don't know what to make of that. It would help if you > would send relevant 'route show' or 'netstat -rn -f inet' > output at each step, so that readers don't have to try to reproduce > these steps on their own. Output for both is actually the same. I think I have the gist of the intent and expected behaviour now. The patch will be adjusted accordingly. Thanks Roy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part