Re: should rt_msg1() zero rt_msghdr?

[jtc%acorntoolworks.com@localhost (J.T. Conklin)]

christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> I think this is right. Should the same be done in rt_msg2()?

Unlike rt_msg1(), rt_msg2() is passed the struct that will be filled
in.  I looked at all callers, and it appears that in each case it is
zeroed before rt_msg2() is called.  So it while it wouldn't hurt, it
does not look like it's necessary.

    --jtc

-- 
J.T. Conklin