Re: scp performance

To: "Aaron Turner" <synfinatic%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: scp performance
From: comfooc <comfooc%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:59:27 +0100

On Jan 17, 2008 8:47 PM, Aaron Turner <synfinatic%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> Machine #1 has a 10Mbps NIC?  950KBps is ~ 7.4Mbps.  Considering
> 10Mbps is 1/2 duplex, and considering TCP overhead, etc I can't say
> I'm all that shocked your performance sucks.

Machine 1 is in this test used mostly as a server and its using full duplex.
The case is that OpenBSD and Linux had a lot better performance than NetBSD.

References:
- scp performance
  - From: comfooc
- Re: scp performance
  - From: Aaron Turner

Prev by Date: Re: scp performance
Next by Date: Re: Memory debugging question...
Previous by Thread: Re: scp performance
Next by Thread: Re: scp performance
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index