--w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 06:49:12PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20061114142400.tiq0c4hi0w8cg8ko@www.enseirb.fr>,
> DEGROOTE Arnaud  <degroote@enseirb.fr> wrote:
> > ~~~~
> >It would be nice too if some people can test the code in more real =20
> >cases and report success and failure. I can provide a =20
> >GENERIC.FAST_IPSEC if someone needs it.
> >
> >Take cares.
> >
> >PS : Please CC me on reply
>=20
> Unfortunately it will be difficult for me to test ipv6 because my provider
> does not use it, but I can definitely check ipv4.

Actually, there are any number of ways to get connectivity to that
Internet, 6to4, a tunnel broker, maybe Teredo.  Anyway, you could
always use a RFC 4193 address block.

I should build this and throw it on my test boxes.  If only racoon
were a bit more stable for me while using GSSAPI, oh well, there's
always PSK.

	Jonathan Kollasch

--w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFFW2tXOjx1ye3hmokRAn+tAJ9JkFk1U+bTq/AWA1aMr1Kmz1IVawCfVvUZ
SrIEuDf/lIBVHUKZL8E68iY=
=9r64
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR--