> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> >> 2) this is not a technical decision for core.
> > 
> > who can make this kind of decisions, then?
> 
> Come on, YAMAMOTO-San, let's be rational here. It's just a variable
> name. It doesn't *really* matter what it's called, as long as it comes
> along with (a) descriptive paragraph(s) in the man-page(s) and a good
> sysctl description.

but it seems that it's what people here care most.

> Let's not drag core into minor issues like that. I think most of us
> wouldn't care and/or would rather the developer doing the work to
> make the choice (unless it's a really bad one, but this hasn't been
> proven in this case -- it seems like a matter of personal taste).
> 
> Can we move on, please? :)

the author of the code is silent on this.
as i said, i'll go with tcp.abc unless anyone objects.
but people objecting.

YAMAMOTO Takashi