I would love to shut up, but I can't sorry ;-)

On Oct 15, 2006, at 9:58 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

>>
>>  - There's prior art.
>
> if you mean rfc1323, it's rather an execption (timestamps, sack,  
> newreno, ...)
> and, IMO, a mistake.

Yes, there is prior art:

 > sysctl net.inet.tcp.abc
net.inet.tcp.abc: 1
 > uname -s
DragonFly

> after all, it's a matter of taste, and continuing this discussion
> doesn't buy us much.  let's ask core a decision.
> (maybe i'll abstain from core voting on this.)

1) You are right that it's a matter of taste.
2) this is not a technical decision for core.
3) you MUST abstain, or else the level of fairness would be low.

--
Rui Paulo