> > "cwnd_inflation" sounds weird to me, given that what it does is
> > ack handling for fast recovery.  otoh, "new_data_acked" inflates cwnd.
> > isn't it better to unify these two callbacks?
> 
> Well, "inflation" is probably not the best word, but I don't see why  
> we want to unify them. What do you have in mind?

because both of them are called sequentially in most cases
(unless rcvacktoomuch, for which we can't do much anyway),
it isn't clear for me what's the benefit to have two callbacks
rather than one.

YAMAMOTO Takashi