On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:01 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> "cwnd_inflation" sounds weird to me, given that what it does is
> ack handling for fast recovery.  otoh, "new_data_acked" inflates cwnd.
> isn't it better to unify these two callbacks?

Well, "inflation" is probably not the best word, but I don't see why  
we want to unify them. What do you have in mind?

> btw, where sack will be in the whole picture, eventually?

I don't know yet. SACK, like ECN, can work with Reno, NewReno and  
other congestion control algorithms. At least, I'm sure we don't want:
congctl.available = reno newreno reno-sack newreno-sack, etc.

--
Rui Paulo